Apple has a new patent problem for the iPhone 6 in Beijing

Fear not mistaken in saying that the many categories among which Apple excels also found that of legal disputes. It has become common to see Apple has to go to the courts of the various countries where it is cited by several causes; this time he has touched Beijing, where he has been accused of violating patents design of a local mobile , so it has been requested cease sales of iPhone models 6 and 6s in their two versions

In fact quoting irony same signature China has decided to sue Apple design patents that relate to the twin brothers of the American brand, model iPhone 6 and 6s.

More problems for Apple in China, this time with the design of the iPhone

From Bloomberg  echoed the situation facing Cupertino in China were made, which already denotes importance on the impact of the event. According to the report, through a failure Intellectual Property Office Beijing seeks to sabotage the sales of the latest models of iPhone company (excluding the iPhone SE), thanks to a patent allegedly registered by Shenzhen Baili,  and which highlights some similarities in the design of both phones.

IPHONE 6 AND IPHONE 6 PLUS INFRINGE PATENT SHENZHEN BAILI (100 C) DUE TO SIMILARITIES IN THEIR PHONE.  

Intellectual Property Office Beijing

The decision affects only Beijing , with a population of at least 21 million people represents a very important market for the brand. The fear is that future lawsuits against Apple could be carried out in various parts of Chinese territory, which would risk much Apple's position in the country.

Given the situation, Apple said in a statement through CNBC confirming that the devices affected demand will continue normally sold until further notice, because the brand has appealed the decision of the patent court in Beijing.

With the state of Apple in China directly affecting the company 's stock status , it is increasingly questionable enter a such a complex market, where the brand has faced increasingly sensitive situations from their settlement in the Asian nation . What do you think of the situation? Do you consider fair decision against the brand?